Your Own Typewriter
I absolutely love Matthew Butterick’s article regarding Medium. I previously wrote about my disappointment with the growth of Medium among established writers, so you can probably guess the tone of Butterick’s piece. Most of his critiques center around what is behind one of Medium’s proudest features, typography:
… I wouldn’t say that Medium’s homogeneous design is bad ex ante. Among web-publishing tools, I see Medium as the equivalent of a frozen pizza: not as wholesome as a meal you could make yourself, but for those without the time or motivation to cook, a potentially better option than just eating peanut butter straight from the jar.
Then he comes around to the base criticism that applies to all of these social networks where you give up ownership, in fact or practice, of your content for convenience.
In truth, Medium’s main product is not a publishing platform, but the promotion of a publishing platform. This promotion brings readers and writers onto the site. This, in turn, generates the usage data that’s valuable to advertisers. Boiled down, Medium is simply marketing in the service of more marketing. It is not a “place for ideas.” It is a place for advertisers. It is, therefore, utterly superfluous…
… Tempting perhaps. But where does it lead? I fear that writers who limit themselves to providing “content” for someone else’s “branded platform” are going to end up with as much leverage as cows on a dairy farm…
I previously wrote about the importance of having your own place online. Invest in your own home, it’s easier than ever, and much more rewarding than subletting from someone else.